Research paper
In return, the shah of Iran stopped arming and supporting the Kurds of northern Iraq in heir rebellion. Positions of Iran and Iraq: After 1968, Iraq was ruled by President al-Carr and, after 1979, Sadism Hussein. These men established friendly relations with both the Soviet Union and the West to build up Iraq’s arms and technology base. The ruling Bath party espoused a Socialist, pan- Arab philosophy and was dominated by Sunnis. In Iran, however, the shah pulled away from the West as religious unrest threatened his rule.
Finally forced to abdicate, the shah left Iran in 1 978; the Ayatollah Shoeing then returned from exile to oversee the creation of a new Islamic state. Shoeing followed the conservative Shiite branch of Islam, as did most Iranians. He denounced the Bath government of Iraq as corrupt and called on Iraqis to overthrow Hussein. The Iranian military ranks had disintegrated during the Islamic revolution and were replaced by independent organizations of often untrained men, such as the Revolutionary Guards. Tribunals executed many of the shah’s supporters, including military officers.
In November 1979, Iran alienated much of the West when the government allowed American hostages to be taken in the U. S. Embassy and held captive. The Invasion: To he ambitious Hussein, Iran looked unstable and isolated. On September 17, 1980, Hussein appeared on television and literally ripped up the Algiers Agreement. Five days later, Iraqi forces invaded Iran. The first bombing targets were the airfields. The Iraqi MIS-ass and MIS-ass failed to destroy Iranian air power, however, because Iran’s planes were sheltered in reinforced hangers.
Hussein’s strategy targeted roads, refineries, and oil fields. Six Iraqi army divisions then attacked across the Shasta al-Arab and the border east of Baghdad, and crossed into Iran. In a month, Iraqi troops occupied a strip of Iranian borderland, including much of Skuzziest, an ancient province. Curiously, the Iraqis stopped there, although the troops’ momentum and the lack of resistance would have allowed then to push further. Also perplexing is the fact that Hussein utilized only half his army in the invasion. These facts lead some observers to wonder what his goals truly were.
Perhaps he wanted no more than the strip of land taken in that first month. Whatever Hussein’s reasons, the Iranian air force retaliated by bombing oil installations near the Iraqi cities Of Kirk and Baghdad, putting them out of operation. Iraq’s casualties were far higher than anticipated. A thrust to take the city of Sharma’s-?the last territorial gain by Iraq-?left at least six thousand Iraqi troops dead after days of hand-to-hand fighting. 2. ) Decodes, David. “Iraq: It Was an Unjust War. ” Iraq: It Was an Unjust War. Santa Clara university, Par. -May 2012. Web. 13 May 2013.
Leading up to the war, President Bush offered a series of causes to go to war. Among them: Sadism was evil; United Nations resolutions must be enforced; the Iraqi people should be liberated. But the cause most often cited by the president was self-defense. Invoking the specter of 9-11 the president argued that the nexus of a tyrant like Sadism, vast stores of weapons of mass destruction, and the presence in Iraq of AH Qaeda operatives or sympathizers was a mortal threat to the united States that justified war. For the president, it was not necessary that there were manifest signs of that threat.
After 9-11, such signs could no longer be expected. What was necessary was to act preventively now or risk an all-but-certainly catastrophic future. While self-defense is the classic instance of a just cause, the highly speculative nature of the president’s self-defense argument was a moral robber from the start. Many critics rightfully said that the president’s unspecified and distantly future nature of the threat from Sadism failed a crucial ethical test: The certainty of war’s death and destruction could not be justified in the face of such distant uncertainty.
In the aftermath of the fighting, this judgment not only holds sway but also appears prescient. The failure thus far to find weapons of mass destruction casts doubt on whatever threat it was that Sadism had posed. Accordingly, the already doubtful self- defense argument used by the president risks, in moral terms, being that such more undermined. Also, a crucial moral question can now be raised about the democratic consent of the American people to go to war on the basis of such possibly erroneous information.
Without the weapons of mass destruction, it has not been surprising to hear the administration now speak of the war in terms of liberty, liberation, and democracy. The president’s speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln was almost entirely in that key. The administration clearly deserves moral praise for the pursuit and, where accomplished, achievement oftenest aims. But the just war principle of repartitioning requires that these moral outcomes never be detached from their close and obvious consequences. The principle asks whether the harms caused by this war are proportionate to the good achieved by it.
In the case of Iraq, the principle points to the following moral problems: the post-war chaos in Iraq; the glacial pace of positive changes, if any, to the situation in Israel and the West Bank; ongoing terrorism like the recent attacks in Riyadh and Morocco; needlessly deteriorating relationships with allies like France, with countries throughout the world, and with the United Nations; and, not east of all, the disturbing and increasingly martial character of the American people. 3. ) “Causes Of War With Iraq. ” Causes Of War With Iraq. Iraqi Close and Personal, Par. May 2011. Web. 13 May 2013. Causes of war with Iraq are controversial, not only in America, but around the world. President Bush calls it the war on terror and, indeed, it is a war on terror. It all started recently with 9/1 1 . September 1 1 , 2001 is the day that AH Qaeda terrorists took over American flights and crashed the planes into two of the World Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania (this lane was meant for the White House). Causes Of war with Iraq include intelligence reports saying Sadism Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
They may exist and be hidden under all of that sand or they could have been moved out of the country. Sadism was committing brutal acts on his own people. Rapes and mass murders were common. Mass graves of his victims have been uncovered and reported on the evening newscasts over and over again. The Iraqi people were forced to submit to Sadism but they hated him. So much indeed that they sentenced him to death by hanging once he had been caught and given an Iraqi trial. Causes of war with Iraq also include protecting Osama bin Laden, who masterminded 9/1 1, along with other things Sadism did in the past.
Back in the sass’s, Sadism tried to build nuclear weapons. He said that he would destroy Israel. And, last but not least, he invaded Kuwait in 1990, which prompted the United States to go over and stop him. The first President Bush should have finished the job in 1991, instead of stopping like he did… What other causes of war with Iraq are there? Greed is one of the causes of war with Iraq-?Sadism Hussein was sitting on one Of the largest deposits Of Oil in the world. He had billions and billions Of dollars in revenue.
