The ideology of Marxism, established by German phi

losopher Karl Marx, is a collectively known set of assumptions of a political ideology, which focuses especially on analysis of materialist interpretation of historical development, or on class struggle within the society. The primarily approach of Marxism, nonetheless, was the critique of capitalism. The strength of his inquiry lies in belief of inevitable shift from capitalism and he aims to advocate the new form of ideology and economy, the socialism. The title of this essay is provocative as in today’s world, there exist many proponents who claim, the core of Marx conception of ideology is still relevant in the 21st globalised world. However, Marxism is relevant to the extent to which is it important to examine every political and economic conception, moreover if we are able to perceive its outcomes after the concepts has been practically applied. This paper is intended to assess key ideas of Marxism with observations of positives and negatives it brought and the reasons why the concepts failed.The word”communism”is generally linked with”Marxism”. Since Marx along with Friedrich Engels published the cutting-edge thesis, The Communist Manifesto in the middle of the 19th century, it conceived the new dimension for both politics and economics. Before turning to the principles of the Manifesto, it is useful to present the brief historical background of the era, and understand why it affected the ideology. Predominantly the Industrial Revolution (IR) and the Great Revolution in France (FR) transformed the society as follows; creation of conditions for capitalism by destroying feudalism. Period between 1820 -1840 marks the beginning of the IR, which altered the whole meantime society. Essential for this period was the great amount of inventions, mostly shift from the hand production to machines which consequently had not so positive impact upon workers, who were uprooted from their traditional environments and condemned to work on lower wages, which therefore causes class struggle. Manifesto deals with “Bourgeois and Proletarians”, where he is asserting that bourgeois is constantly trying to maximize its profit by exploiting proletarians and their manual labour. Marx and Engels claim”The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle”. At this point it is almost certain, why IR influenced Marx as much as he came up with idea of socialism and yet, of communism. Secondarily, the (FR) in France from 1789 to 1799 was another radical and political event in the worldwide history. Marx and Engels based their analysis of the FR, as a series of class struggle. Both concluded, that in society of material inequality it is impossible to reach an actual freedom, considering the slogans of IR”Liberty, Equality and Fraternality”, if the society is divided into exploiters and exploited, meaning Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. This observation was vital to Marx’s concept.The next section draws attention on the central feature of Marxist approach, the historical materialism. The”Materialist Conception of history”was to the Critique of Political Economy; the fundamental argument here, is that economics is the motor for the history as a whole; in other words, Marxists argue that the procedure of historical changes is in analyse, all are the development in economy. Additionally, unlike Hegel’s interpretation of dialectics (thesis-antithesis – synthesis), where he holds on mental world, or mind and ideas, Marx in turn deviates solely onto physical or material world. Marx was opposed to idealism; he identifies the ideas as major cause of materialistic changes.”In 1844 he teamed up with Engels to work on a critique of the idealism of the Young Hegelians, and out of this came their first attempt to outline the methods of historical materialism, in a work called The German Ideology.”Moreover, as he was opposed against idealism so he was against religion. He rejects it entirely as in his view religion is giving to working class hope for”paradise”by the ruling class.The key theme Marx insists on is substantial conflict between means of production and relations of production both form the economic base of a society. Hence, considering