Mercurial Essays

Free Essays & Assignment Examples

Two-way Communication, With Both Parties Able To Express Themselves On

the most
deep-rooted issues and really hear the other, is key to change in a family
business. That was the central point of John Messervey’s address to the Family
Business center, September 9, 1997 at the Springfield Sheraton.

Messervey, of the National Family Business Council in Lake Forest, Illinois,
believes that nearly every family business will benefit by change;emdash;and
that those who attended are ready to catalyze that process: “You are here
because you want something to change.”
The specifics will vary from business to business; in recent cases, Messervey
encountered these desires: a son wanted his father to invest in a new project; a
mother was accused by her child of meddling; a sibling looked for ways to
prevent his brother from antagonizing key employees; another sibling was asked
to “quit pretending she’s working.”
Messervey’s analysis concentrated on the family, which he sees as “the prototype
for all organization; business patterns are just an extension” of the roles
played out in family dynamics. In every family there will be “customers for
change”&emdash;those who stand to benefit from upsetting the applecart, often
the family scapegoats or those who feel disenfranchised. But there are also
“guardians of the status quo,” who like things just the way they are and
vigorously protect their turf. One of Messervey’s clients compared change in his
family to “bowling in sand.”
Every family has its own set of myths, roles, and rules or customs. But at the
same time, there are “secrets” and “unspeakables”; these hidden shames are the
action points for change
To demonstrate, Messervey showed a short clip from “Prince of Tides,” showing a
sharply dysfunctional family. Nick Nolte plays a husband who blocks his wife’s
every attempt to bring up important issues. But at the same time, he and his own
mother have some serious unfinished business to take care of&emdash;deep and
dark “unspeakables”&emdash;which causes every interaction between them to run up
against a wall of mutual hostility.

In Nolte’s fictional family, as in any other, those who are ignored find a way
to act out and be noticed. And since family members know better than anyone else
how to hit the “hot buttons” that will get a reaction from other family members,
the stakes can be pretty high. When you know how to get someone really furious,
you run the risk of starting a long-lasting feud that could run for decades. But
Messervey comments, “they must have really cared for each other; you don’t fight
if you don’t care.”
He believes many of the silly disagreements among family members are “to add
heat. Over time, all relationships cool.” These little sparks are a way to keep
the relationship fresh and interesting, even after a half-century or more, as
Messervey demonstrated with a second video clip, from “For Better or For
Worse”;emdash;where, despite 56 years of happy marriage, a couple still can’t
let go of an ancient minor argument.

But that family was able to openly air their disagreement. In families with
deeper problems, attempts at communication are continuously rebuffed. Messervey
quoted sociologist Carl Whittaker’s book, The Family Crucible:
Why, in spite of a genuine desire to change, does a family hold back???If a
family has tried repeatedly to change and has met only pain and failure, making
still another attempt can have frightening overtones??What if they really
try;emdash;and fail again? What is left except utter despair? The family cringes
in fear; they fight against the change which they know they must attempt.

But don’t confuse fear by disempowered family members of initiating change with
resistance to change by those who will lose power: that resistance, says
Messervey, is a sign that things are working. Change is imminent and the
guardians of the status quo are desperately trying to block it. They feel the
pressure, the need to acknowledge the issues; the call for change can no longer
be simply swept under the rug. In fact, the rug is bulging so high off the
floor&emdash;to stretch the metaphor a bit farther&emdash;that someone had
better do something before there’s a liability suit to contend with.

Some families have ignored so many little issues that, like a dense forest that
needs a huge fire to clean out the underbrush, they really need a big blow-up to
clear the air.

One option to deal with this pressure is to bring in a different kind of
consultant: one who is oriented toward process, rather than symptoms. Messervey
says this kind of consultant is much better suited to complicated systems.

The old fashioned expert consultant may provide a checklist of solutions, but if
those solutions focus on past mistakes, on fixing only the obvious
symptoms;emdash;and fail to address the underlying issues at the root;emdash;the
destructive patterns will reemerge. The process consultant, on the other hand,
looks at systemic health, patiently approaches the situation with a focus on the
present instead of the past, and works together with the client to find
solutions the client will “own.” Rather than affixing blame, the goal is to
change the long-held patterns, to strive toward organizational wellness in a
non-judgmental, intuitive approach that focuses on solutions;emdash;not
problems.

A consultant;emdash;or an organization working internally;emdash;should examine
power, control, conflict, and intimacy. Intimacy isn’t often discussed in family
businesses, but, says Messervey, “it’s easier to stay angry than to admit our
need to be loved.”
Messervey uses the Beavers Scale for measuring conflict management: family
members self-evaluate based on a series of questions, and are ranked into five
categories, from severely dysfunctional to optimal. Another part of the test
measures the level of family entanglement, from extremely enmeshed to
disengaged. At the severely dysfunctional level, there is not only no
communication, but no leadership. The next two steps are tightly bound, either
by a dictatorial leader or by an inflexible set of rules.

Finally, the adequate and optimal families are flexible, comfortable with
feelings of “love, annoyance, and frustration,” focused on goals, and able to
resolve most conflicts. They rest easy, knowing that, “whatever happens, we can
work it out.”