Morality And Practicality Of Euthanasia

Morality and Practicality of Euthanasia
Euthanasia is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary as the action of killing
an individual for reasons considered to be merciful (Leonesio 292). Here, killing is
described as the physical action where one individual actively kills another. Euthanasia is
tolerated in the medical field under certain circumstances when a patient is suffering
profoundly and death is inevitable. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek eu,
good, and thanatos, death, literally, good death; however, the word euthanasia is
much more difficult to define. Each person may define euthanasia differently. Who is to
decide whether a death is good or not? It is generally taken today to mean that act which a
health care professional carries out to help his/her patient achieve a good death. While
growing up, each of us learns a large number of rules of conduct. Which rules we learn
will depend on the kind of society we live in and the parents and the friends we have.
Sometimes we learn a rule without understanding its point. In most cases this may work
out, for the rule may be designed to cover ordinary circumstances, but when faced with
unusual situations, we may be in trouble. This situation is the same with moral rules.
Without understanding the rules, we may come to think of it as a mark of virtue that we
will not consider making exceptions to. We need a way of understanding the morality
against killing. The point is not to preserve every living thing possible, but to protect the
interests of individuals to have the right of choice to die.

Firstly, there are ethical guidelines for euthanasia. If the following guidelines are met,
then euthanasia is considered acceptable. The person must be a mature adult. This is
essential. The exact age will depend on the individual but the person should not be a minor
who would come under quite different laws. Secondly, the person must have clearly made
a considered decision. An individual has the ability now to indicate this with a living will
(which applies only to disconnection of life supports) and can also, in today’s more open
and tolerant society, freely discuss the option of euthanasia with health-care professionals,
family, lawyers, etc. The euthanasia must not be carried out at the first knowledge of a
life-threatening illness, and reasonable medical help must have been sought to cure or at
least slow down the terminal disease. It is when the fight is clearly hopeless and the agony,
physical and mental, is unbearable that a final exit is an option. The treating physician must
have been informed, asked to be involved, and his or her response been taken into
account. The physician’s response will vary depending on the circumstances, of course, but
they should advise their patients that a rational suicide is not a crime. It is best to inform
the doctor and hear his or her response. For example, the patient might be mistaken.
Perhaps the diagnosis has been misheard or misunderstood. Patients raising this subject
were met with a discreet silence or meaningless remarks in the past but in today’s more
accepting climate most physicians will discuss potential end of life actions. The person
must have a Will disposing of his or her worldly effects and money. ( Docker)
This shows evidence of a tidy mind, an orderly life, and forethought, all things which
are important to an acceptance of rational suicide. The person must have made plans to
die that do not involve others in criminal liability or leave them with guilty feelings.
Assistance in suicide is a crime in most places, although the laws are gradually changing,
and very few cases ever come before the courts. The only well known instance of a
lawsuit concerning this is the doctor-assisted suicide of Dr. Kevorkian. The person must
leave a note saying exactly why he or she is taking their life. This statement in writing
removes the chance of misunderstandings or blame. It also demonstrates that the
departing person is taking full responsibility for the action. These are all guidelines for
allowing a euthanasia to take place. By this, I mean the doctor is involved in the patient’s
decision and