Mercurial Essays

Free Essays & Assignment Examples

Police Brutality Research Paper

With all of the current situations in the world, it is surprising that re searchers can not completely figure out why the police agencies and government does not keep data on the number of people who die by police shootings. It is important that the public pays close e attention to the number of victims Of police shootings, it is essential that solid evidence is pro vided as proof instead of keeping all of the public in the dark about things, and it is important t that the news does not overcome a topic to where it gets confusing and people really have no did a what the real issue is and they do not know what to believe!

From the early to minidisks, united States citizens have recorded and written down almost everything. That is initially what made our Constitution more impacting than the constitutions of other countries. The government has records on how many p people live in the United States, they have records on the number of car accidents per year, the y have records on the number of animals that live on farms… What is the reason that they do not have records on Millennia 2 how many people are victims of police shootings? It does not seem like some hind that is very hard to keep records on.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The Washington Post published an article stating, “C rimming justice experts note that, while the federal government and national research group (NOR) keeps scads of data and stats… There is no reliable national data on how many people are s hot by police officers each yea;(How Many Police Shootings a year? No One Knows). One w loud think that since businesses and corporations have to complete certain amounts of data to meet regulations and keep the company running smoothly. It is interesting that, “The nation’s 1 8,000 law enforcement agencies are not required to compile data on officeholder SSH toting” (Bruins).

The issue of officeholder shootings are a huge deal in the eyes of many; so why not keep track of this stuff? The only productive thing that one could do with statistics 0 n how many animals are living on farms, or how many shark attacks there were in 201 0 is do certain studies on those topics and make scientific assumptions or create problems that deal with those topics. Since current events such as the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri RI, or the whole situation in Baltimore, Maryland, it has been brought to the attention of the p public that there loud very possibly be a large issue in the nation’s police force.

It could very w ell be the other way around too; the police officers could be doing the right thing and doing the Eire jobs the way that they should be and the people who are getting killed are really bad people e that are in gangs or terrorist groups or they are really disrespecting and assaulting a police off cert.. And the police officer shoots them in selfness. What is making most people question the honesty of our government is the f act that it seems that some of the deaths of people by police shootings are “mysteriously Y’ disappearing.

In an article written by Rob Barry and Coulter Jones, they state, “… According to n atonal statistics Millennia 3 intended to track police shootings, Mr… Patron’s death in August 201 2 never h appended” (Barry and Jones). This quote was referencing the 2012 shooting of a arrear old ma n in Washington state who had wielded a knife in front of the police. A good question was asks d by Jeffrey Fagan, a professor of law at Columbia University, Men cops are killed, there is a very careful account and there’s a national database. Why not the other side of the ledger ? “(Barry and Jones).

Such questions are becoming more prevalent in today’s society due to the ABA mundane of news coverage on topics such as these. The government has answered the queue’s NSA with answers such as ” recording data is not mandatory” but in an article by Mr… Bruins, he stats De, “Because reporting is voluntary, our data is incomplete and therefore, in the aggregate, unreliable” (Bruins). Events like the police officer who suffocated or strangled a man in New York City, occur almost daily. As stated in an article on police killings, “… The question of how often does this happen…. The answer: no one knows for sure… Bruins). It only seems f air that the public knows how many people the police are killing. Special and private studies have e been done to see how many deaths, if any are recorded by townships or States, “A Wall Street joy urinalysis analysis of the latest data from 1 05 of the country’s largest police agencies found moor e than foundered and fifty police killings during those years were missing from the national tally and Jones). Are they forgetting to tally or are they trying to cover up for those polio e agencies? This is another question that will most likely never be answered.

It is very unfortunate et that one must live in a day and age when they can not even trust the police officers whom AR e there to protect these people and make sure they feel safe; not skeptical about their police o officers. Aside from the data that government law enforcement agencies have failed to provide, the public hears about the issues being “taken care of’ in the news. In the Mica hall Brown Millennia 4 shooting in Missouri, it took them what seemed like forever to come to a decide Soon on how to charge the officer whom had shot the young man in the back 68 times.

What s really being “taken care off though? The public has been kept in the dark about a good ma sorority of these situations. What the public has not been kept in the dark about is always queues actionable. In this same Michael Brown case, riots broke out into the streets, there was looting a ND burning of local stores such as Auto Zone, Pallets Shoes, and Taco Bell. Reporters interviewed hundreds Of protesters and many of them had lied and said they had seen the whole thing and the officer what in the wrong and the young man who had gotten shot was doing nothing war nag at all.

So due to that, there happens to be gullible people who think that Michael Brown was I innocent, and then there happens to be people, whether they be racists, or officers, or just civilize d people who are thinking in a very rational manner, saying that the officer who shot Michael dry own is most likely innocent and shot the young man out Of selfness. The point is, people real lay do not know what goes on at all. “The grand juries meet and work secrete'(Public Kept in D ark in Shooting by Officer). The grand juries are the ones who supposedly have all of the facts and proper information to prosecute or not prosecute someone.

All the public knows ABA UT the grand jury is their verdict. The public may also ask, Well what about police monitors or dash cams in the squad cars? According to a Texas newspaper article, ” The police monitor memo is under wraps and the contents of the memo may never be known… Especially to the public” (Public Kept in Dark in Shooting by Officer). It seems as though many things could be proven Ted or at least the offenders could be prosecuted in an appropriate manner, if the police and go Vermont agencies released the “secret” information from their police issued squad cars.

Some o officers such as the officers in Hampton, Illinois are wearing cameras in their protective vests and tit that, they are Millennia 5 able to record everything that happens throughout the course of their day who ill on duty. The items such as the police memos should be solid evidence to prosecute some en, but instead, they can keep that a secret and pretend it never existed and create a huge mess of r not only those two people, but the whole nation once media gets involved. The possibility that the police officers could be in the wrong most of the time s just absurd to many people.

The reality is, that is a very large possibility. Not all pop lice officers are in the wrong, and not all police officers are perfect. But with today’s technology, it is a lot harder for cops to “bend the truth” a little bit or viscera. It is now legal (in Illinois at least) to video tape a police officer. Whether is is him/ her on a phone, not wearing a seat belt, harassing someone, or just a routine traffic stop, you have the right to record them. In a n article on this issue, it is said, “… Officers were enraged to know that people are taping them” (Pappas and Williams).

Again, this is not referring to all police officers, just a select few. So me could look at it in a way that is insulting, or some could look at it in a way that is harmful to heir image. To be completely honest, if someone one were to be put in the position of a police o officer, they may not want to be recorded either. The only difference is, police officers and other go Vermont officials can keep their recordings a secret, but the public can expose their recordings to the world via social media or testing or whatever it may be. But citizens look at video record ding as a way to keep police officers completely honest.

Maybe a part of why things are so “sec ret” is because the government wants to make sure the police forces continue to have their good reputations as they should. People who have been exposed to this stuff more than most people s ay that officers have an advantage most of the time; “Everyone in this business knows that cops h eave been given the benefit of the doubt said Hugh F. Kef, a Connecticut lawyer who has defend De several police Millennia 6 officers accused of misconduct” (Pappas and Williams). Back in the day, police officers we the ones you could go and seek for help, or just rely on to always be there.

Now a days, no one really calls the police unless it is an absolute emergency. Maybe it is society’s fault, o r maybe it is the police force’s or government’s fault. Society may have very well lost faith in the e police forces. The reasons may be unknown, but in the present time, it would not be surprise Inning. In addition to the advancement in technology, media is covering much more o f the shootings. With no data being brought forth on the number of police shooting s, it is hard to tell whether or not media coverage has expanded the relevance of police shooting gas or if they really have increased within the recent years.

It is no question that one can turn on the television at any given time of the day and find some sort Of news broadcast whether it be local , national, or world news. A person can listen to the satellite radio or AM radio in a car, in a field s nowhere, or in a store and hear the news as well. There are also smart phones, and with those , one can be almost anywhere in the world and find out the latest news update at any time. Reefer inning back to the Michael Brown case in Ferguson, CNN was covering that whole situation for a bout as long as it lasted.

The public has constant updates on that. The point is, there is really no telling whether the television stations or radio stations are covering these cases a bit more closes or if there is really a rise in politicized crime. That, right there, is a whole other research topic t hat one could look into. The coverage gives people more ambition and motive to get involved in t he current events and it gets them fired up over the current events in today’s world.

If the United State’s government would focus more on what the police are area Ill doing and making sure the facts are correct, it would most definitely help the nation come to some sort of agreement on whether the police forces are right or wrong in what they AR e doing. What would Millennia 7 elf figure out what is really happening is collecting data, exposing more of w hat the police and certain people in higher powers have access to, and limiting the amount of PU ability that these cases get would control some Of this craziness as well.

The data could show 0 verbal numbers of what is happening in our country as far as the police forces go and maybe hell p the communities and states select better cops. The exposing of certain things such as police m memos, and the other evidences and facts that the grand juries get to see would possibly help the p public understand these stories a bit better than what they do now a days. If the news stations did d not cover the riots and protests tenderfoot hours a day, at weeks at a time, the nation would not get so confused on what is happening with the situations and police forces in the country.

x

Hi!
I'm Belinda!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out